BARRIE DEON SHELTON, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
JACK B. HEARD, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court corrects a typographical error in a prior opinion and withdraws a subsequent reconsideration opinion that improperly emphasized the error.
The court issued an initial opinion, then a sua sponte reconsideration opinion which contained a typographical error regarding a filing date. This rec…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sua Sponte Reconsideration cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The initial opinion in this case was dated February 3, 1983. On April 18, 1983, we issued an additional opinion on sua sponte reconsideration. Both are published at 696 F. 2d 1127 (5th Cir.1983). The original February 3, 1983 opinion contained a typographical error relative to the date of filing the complete trial court record in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The opinion stated that date to be February 14, 1981. The correct date was February 14, 1980.
In our sua sponte reconsideration, we took note of what we referred to as “the unexplained 16-month hiatus between the date the record was completed in Shelton’s case and the date it was filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.” Thus, the typographical error in the original opinion was improperly emphasized in the opinion on reconsideration.1 Fortunately, the error does not affect the result of the court’s initial opinion. By this further reconsideration, we correct the typographical error in our original opinion dated February 3,1983, and withdraw the opinion on sua sponte reconsideration dated April 18, 1983.
. In explanation of, but not as an excuse for, the court’s action, we would note that neither party called our attention to the typographical error in the original opinion until the opinion on sua sponte reconsideration had been issued.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. Procunier, 755 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir. 1985)
Authorities Cited
- Barrie Deon Shelton v. Heard, 696 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1983)