R.E. RODGERS AND BARBARA RODGERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

JAMES G. WATT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1983-05-13

No. 80-3482

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

705 F.2d 1176 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1983) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Rakhil Felshina v. Schweiker, 707 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1983)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

R.E. RODGERS AND BARBARA RODGERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JAMES G. WATT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

R.E. RODGERS AND BARBARA RODGERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

JAMES G. WATT, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE