MARIA APIAU, M.D., APPELLANT,
v.
THE FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PROFESSIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-08-06
No. 84-1828
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
473 So. 2d 775 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In a 169-count complaint, appellant, a licensed Florida physician, was charged with inappropriately prescribing methaqualone (quaaludes)1 on twenty-two specified dates to nine patients in violation of chapter 458, Florida Statutes (1983) (Medical Practice Act) and section 893.05, Florida Statutes (1983) (Florida Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act). The drug dispensing operation was run out of a “Stress Clinic” owned by a non-physician. This appeal is brought from a license revocation order of the Board of Medical Examiners. On examination of the entire record the evidence of statutory violations is overwhelming. The order is therefore

Affirmed.

. Each prescription was for forty-five tablets of 300 mg. methaqualone. Some were written before the "patients" were seen.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cohn v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 477 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …t is required to fill any prescription, no matter how regular in form, if he chooses not to do so. . This court has recently affirmed the revocation of the medical license of one of these physicians. Apiau v. The Florida Board of Medical Examiners, 473 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). . 893.04(1): (a) Oral prescriptions must be promptly reduced to writing by the pharmacist. [*1042] (b) The written prescription must be dated and signed by the prescribing practitioner on the day when issued. (c) There shall a…
  • Cole v. Heritage Cmtys., Inc., 838 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
    …nett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Florida Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n. v. Wells, 755 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Notably, the withdrawal of an attorney does not give the client an absolute right to a continuance. See Alter v. Alter, 473 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). There is nothing in the record to indicate that the denial of the appellants’ motion for continuance created an injustice for them. This was not a difficult trial. There were few witnesses, and the appellants had possession of a…
  • …ivil case “should be rarely withheld and then only upon a determination that to grant said request would interfere with the efficient and proper functioning of the court (quoting Fisher v. State, 248 So. 2d 479, 486 (Fla. 1971))); Alter v. Alter, 473 So. 2d 775, 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding: “In a civil case an attorney’s withdrawal does not give his client an absolute right to a continuance. A continuance under such circumstances is still a matter within the court’s discretion”). We also affirm…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw