KISI PETELOSANELE RAASS, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT. TEVITA NGALUAFE AND CHRISTINA NGALUAFE, PETITIONERS, V. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
KISI PETELOSANELE RAASS, PETITIONER,
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT. TEVITA NGALUAFE AND CHRISTINA NGALUAFE, PETITIONERS, V. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
692 F.2d 596
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1982)
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
These petitioners have been ordered deported to the Tonga nation where they were born. They assert that in Tonga they would be deprived of rights to land because they do not have the right lineal history.
The relief of asylum in the United States depends on something more than generalized economic disadvantage at the destination.
There is not substantial claim of a probable political persecution as decided under the heretofore decided cases.
The records support the determination made by the Immigration Judge.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
United States v. Little, 753 F.2d 1420 (9th Cir. 1984)
-
United States v. Gonzalez, 800 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1986)
-
United States v. Monks, 774 F.2d 945 (9th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence