NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
FLORIDA TILE COMPANY, DIVISION OF SIKES CORPORATION, RESPONDENT/CROSS-PETITIONER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's decision finding the company violated the Act by discharging an employee for union activity is supported by substantial evidence.
An employee was discharged after soliciting union authorization cards and wearing a union button, receiving two disciplinary slips for incidents occur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unlawful Discharge cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before the court upon application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement (No. 81-1402) and Florida Tile Company’s petition for review (No. 81-1467) of the decision and order of the Board reported at 255 N.L.R.B. No. 9. Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a recitation of pertinent facts and issues.
Upon consideration, the court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). This includes that part of the decision and order holding that the company violated § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging Ms. Connie Beavers, and directing her reinstatement with backpay.
Ms. Beavers was discharged after she solicited the signing of Union authorization cards, had worn a Union button and otherwise supported the campaign of the Union to represent the employees as collective bargaining representative. A company rule authorized the discharge of an employee after receipt of three disciplinary slips in one year. Ms. Beavers had received only one disciplinary slip before the beginning of the Union campaign. After she had begun soliciting signature cards, she was presented with two disciplinary slips at the same time growing out of two incidents occurring the same day. Ms. Beavers was discharged for "harassing and badgering another employee to do something against her will” and for “making vicious and malicious statements about a fellow employee,” both of which statements included profanity. It is significant that two other employees, Ms. Joan Newton and Ms. Pat Humphrey, who opposed the Union and had used profanity in making derogatory statements, were not disciplined by the Company. See, e.g., Head Division, AMF, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 593 F. 2d 972, 975 (10th Cir. 1979) (disparate treatment of employees supports inference of unlawful motivation); N.L.R.B. v. Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Co., 579 F. 2d 304, 312 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 960, 99 S.Ct. 1501, 59 L.Ed.2d 773 (1979) (disparate enforcement of valid company rule is proper basis for inference of unlawful motivation).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.
Entered by order of the court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Local 594 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 776 F.2d 1310 (6th Cir. 1985)
Authorities Cited
- Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)
- Big Three Indus. Gas & Equip. Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 440 U.S. 960 (U.S. 1979)
- Orr v. Argus-Press Co., 440 U.S. 960 (U.S. 1979)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. BIG Three Indus. GAS & Equip. Co., 579 F.2d 304 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Head Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 593 F.2d 972 (10th Cir. 1979)