ROOSEVELT JAMES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The use of a deceased eyewitness's preliminary hearing testimony transcript at trial was constitutionally permissible.
Petitioner was convicted of second-degree murder based in part on a transcript of an eyewitness's prior testimony. The witness had been cross-examined…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Admissibility Of Prior Testimony cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is a Florida habeas case by a prisoner convicted of second degree murder. Denial of the writ is AFFIRMED.
Primary evidence against petitioner in his jury trial was a transcript, read to the jury by the court reporter, of an eyewitness’ testimony given nine months earlier at a preliminary hearing. The witness was sworn before testifying at the preliminary hearing and was subjected to cross-examination by petitioner’s attorney. The witness died after the preliminary hearing and before the trial. Use of this testimony under these circumstances was constitutionally permissible. Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 100 S.Ct. 2531, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980); California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970); Mattox v. U. S., 156 U.S. 237, 15 S.Ct. 337, 39 L.Ed.2d 409 (1895).
When the transcript of the eyewitness’ testimony was introduced the court instructed that the jury was to consider the testimony the same as though the witness were testifying before them in court. Defense counsel objected, and the judge then stated that he only meant to emphasize that the deceased witness had been testifying under oath at the preliminary hearing. As explained by the court, the instruction was not erroneous.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (U.S. 1980)
- California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (U.S. 1970)
- Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1895)