UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AUDIT DIRECTOR, ERNEST D. MOORE, PETITIONERS-APPELLEES,
v.
LOTUS PETROLEUM, INC., AND TERRY TOOTLE, AN AUTHORIZED AGENT, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AUDIT DIRECTOR, ERNEST D. MOORE, PETITIONERS-APPELLEES,
LOTUS PETROLEUM, INC., AND TERRY TOOTLE, AN AUTHORIZED AGENT, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS
678 F.2d 1082
United States Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with the authorities cited in our recent opinion decided April 9, 1982 in consolidated appeals Nos. 5-71 and 5-77, United States of America, et al. v. Andrus Energy Corporation, et al. and No. 5-72, United States of America v. Robison Energy, Inc., et al., 678 F. 2d 1081, and for the reasons stated therein, we hold that Appellants’ challenge of the Department of Energy subpoena in question and the order enforcing it by United States District Judge Woodrow B. Seals, Southern District of Texas, is frivolous and entirely without merit; that the subpoena is valid and was properly enforced.
The order and judgment of the District Court appealed from should be and is hereby affirmed and this appeal dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The United States v. LaJET, Inc., 685 F.2d 1378 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1982)
-
United States & Jane O'Neill v. Thriftyman, Inc., 704 F.2d 1240 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1983)
-
United States v. Tex. Energy Petroleum Corp., 719 F.2d 394 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Andrus Energy Corp., 678 F.2d 1081 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1982)