IN RE INQUIRY CONCERNING JUDGE, BERNARD MUSZYNSKI. NO. 84-236
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Judge Muszynski received a public reprimand for arrogantly castigating a police officer over a radio noise complaint and then issuing an improper judicial directive on his letterhead.
A judge who publicly castigates a police officer and subsequently issues an improper judicial directive on his letterhead warrants a public reprimand.
[1] A judge who publicly castigates a police officer and issues an improper judicial directive on judicial letterhead commits misconduct warranting public reprimand.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJudge Muszynski objected to a police officer's radio noise at a restaurant on November 20, 1984, arrogantly castigated the officer after being told th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Discipline cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On April 15, 1985, the Judicial Qualifications Commission filed its Notice of Formal Proceedings and Stipulation for Submission to the Supreme Court. In the stipulation, the parties agreed that the following factual matters stated in the Notice of Formal Proceedings were true:
On November 20, 1984, while having lunch at a Howard Johnson’s restaurant, you objected to the noise of a police officer’s radio which was being operated by Police Officer Thomas A. Reynolds. You directed Officer Reynolds to turn down the volume of the radio or turn it off. When Officer Reynolds responded that the radio was as low as its capacity and that regulations prohibited him from turning it off, you, after identifying yourself as a Circuit Judge, arrogantly castigated Officer Reynolds. Subsequently, by letter on your judicial letterhead, on November 21, 1984, you forwarded a letter to Officer Reynolds stating therein:
In lieu of a Rule to Show Cause, you are hereby directed to be and appear in my Chambers (Room 479) at the Orange County Courthouse, Orlando, Florida, at 10:00 o’clock a.m., on Tuesday, November 27, 1984, to explain your contemptuous conduct.
Failure to appear shall constitute a separate and independent contempt.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission has recommended a public reprimand. We accept the Commission’s recommendations and the publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter shall serve as Judge Muszynski’s public reprimand for his conduct,
It ⅛ so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, 995 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 2008)…imanding a judge for, among other things, threatening a prosecutor by stating “if you talk any more[,] it’s an Order that you don’t open your mouth anymore until I invite you to do so, and if you do I’m gonna hold you in contempt”); In re Muszynski, 471 So. 2d 1284, 1285 (Fla.1985) (imposing discipline for demanding a police officer to lower the volume on his police radio while dining in a restaurant and, when the officer refused, directing him to appear in court to explain his “contemptuous conduct”); In re C…