DELORES DEJERINETT, APPELLANT,

v.

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ALL RISK CORPORATION OF AMERICA, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Hadden v. State, 690 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1997)
  …d it with a relevancy standard. See, e.g., Andrews v. State, 533 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), review denied, 542 So. 2d 1332 (1989); Kruse v. State, 483 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), review dismissed, 507 So. 2d 588 (1987); Hawthorne v. State, 470 So. 2d 770, 782-86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Ervin, J., concurring in part and dissenting-in part). In Kruse, a ease involving the issue of the admissibility of syndrome opinion evidence in a child-abuse prosecution, the Fourth District utilized the relevancy stand…
• Kruse v. State, 483 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …1385] of admissibility of evidence relating to new scientific procedures, to the more generous relevancy standard contained in the evidence code. Id. at 85-90; see also Fay v. Mincey, 454 So. 2d 587, 593-94 (Fla.2d DCA 1984), and Hawthorne v. State, 470 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Ervin, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). The more rigid standard evolved from the decision in Frye v. United States, 293 Fed. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), which barred the admission of the results of a lie detector test be…
• Marsh v. Valyou, 977 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2007)
  …d of repeating a supposed requirement of “general acceptance” not elsewhere imposed, they would arrive at a practical way of utilizing the results of scientific advances. Brown, 426 So. 2d at 88 (quoting McCormick, § 203). . In Hawthorne v. State, 470 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), the First District, without a mention of Frye, found no error in the trial court’s exclusion of an expert witness’s testimony without prejudice to the reconsideration of that issue upon retrial. In a separate opinion, however, J…

  ← 1 / 2 →