STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

G.S.G., A CHILD, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Legion Cmty. Club v. Murray Diamond, 561 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 1990)
  …Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Berkley Multi-Units, Inc. v. Linder, 464 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Mohican Valley, Inc. v. MacDonald, 443 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In its decision, the court expressly noted conflict with Albega Corp. v. Manning, 468 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and Chapman v. L & N Grove, Inc., 244 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), and certified the question to us as one of great public importance. The question we must determine is whether the amended complaint in Suit II, which sought t…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Daugharty v. Faye Eubanks Daugharty, 502 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …entitled to maintain a lis pendens as a matter of law.” Based on this finding, the court denied the motions of the defendant to set a security bond or to cancel, dissolve and discharge the lis pendens. The trial court cited Albega Corp. v. Manning, 468 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) as authority for its finding that the wife could maintain her lis pen-dens as a matter of right. The court’s reliance on Albega is misplaced. The instant case, unlike Albega, is not an action “founded on a duly recorded instrume…
• Murray Diamond v. Am. Legion Cmty. Club OF Coconut Grove, Inc., 544 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …4th DCA 1985); Mohican Valley, Inc. v. MacDonald, 443 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), receding from Florida Peach Corp. v. Lurie, 411 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). We certify conflict with the first and second districts, Albega Corp. v. Manning, 468 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Chapman v. L & N Grove, Inc., 244 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), and certify the following question as being of great public importance: WHETHER A SUIT TO SET ASIDE A CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IS AN ACTION “FOUNDED ON A DULY…

Authorities Cited

• State v. S.L.W., 465 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 1985)