MARIANO S. FALCON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-APPELLEE
MARIANO S. FALCON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CROSS-APPELLANT,
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-APPELLEE
647 F.2d 633
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1981)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
The judgment of this Court in this case having been vacated by the Supreme Court 101 S.Ct. 1752, and remanded for further consideration in light of Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S.-, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d-(1981), the case is now remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Burdine.
The Court did not deal with that part of our prior judgment that decided or remanded non-jBurdine issues for further consideration of the trial court. We, therefore, reinstate Parts IV and V of our original opinion.
REMANDED.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
It appearing that in our Order of May 29, 1981, we did not fully specify our non-Burdine issues, we now amend the last sentence of that Order to read as follows:
We, therefore, reinstate parts I, II, IV, V and VI of our original opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Tel. Co. of the Sw. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1982)
-
Payne v. Travenol Labs., Inc., 673 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1982)
-
Evans v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 696 F.2d 925 (11th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tex. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1981)