IN RE THE ADOPTION OF A.C.R. AND C.W.R

Fla. 2d DCA | 1985-04-10
No. 84-2362
RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.
467 So. 2d 434 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Bryson, appeals the trial court’s order entered in favor of appel-lees, Camille Reynolds and James Larkin Reynolds, holding that the adoption agreement entered into between the parties was valid. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, we find that there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the trial court. Friedman v. U.S. Home Corp., 452 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); In re Estate of Rodgers, 149 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

Accordingly, we affirm.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Long v. State, 494 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1986)
    …EHRLICH, Justice. We have before us two cases, Long v. State, 469 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), and Barry v. State, 467 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), which we have consolidated for our review. In both cases the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question as being of great public importance: HAS THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, BY ITS AGREEMENT IN STATE V. MURRA…
  • Long v. State, 469 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
    …as made. Ed Ricke and Sons, Inc. v. Green, 468 So. 2d 908 (Fla.1985). The evidence in this case was sufficient, in our opinion, to overcome the error so we affirm the conviction. However, we certify the same question we certified in Barry v. State, 467 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), viz: Has the Florida Supreme Court, by its agreement in State v. Murray, 443 So. 2d 955 (Fla.1984) with the analysis of the supervisory powers of appellate courts as related to the harmless error rule as set forth in United Sta…
  • Barry v. State, 504 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
    …jury would have returned a verdict of guilty in the absence [*528] of the prosecutor’s allusion to Barry’s failure to testify in his own defense. The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED. UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur. . Barry v. State, 467 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). . This was the first of several statements made by the defendant and admitted into evidence and commented on by defense counsel and the prosecutor in their respective closing arguments. . The second and third of these statemen…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw