UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
HOLLIS CLARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
HOLLIS CLARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
622 F.2d 917
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The order granting a rehearing en banc, 608 F. 2d 238, is vacated as having been improvidently granted on the record before us, and the panel opinion, 598 F. 2d 994, is reinstated.
GEE, Circuit Judge, with whom BROWN, CHARLES CLARK, TJOFLAT, FAY, REAVLEY, POLITZ, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges, join, specially concurring.
I concur in the court’s order because no proffer was made of evidence tending to show advances in the state of polygraph art since the seminal opinion in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir. 1923), upon which our authorities are based, or the competence of polygraphic operators. Had one been made, in my view these authorities would properly be subject to reconsideration.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Piccinonna, 885 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir. 1989)
-
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F.2d 1106 (5th Cir. 1991)
-
Barrel OF FUN, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 739 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Hollis Clark, 598 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1979)
- United States v. Hollis Clark, 608 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1979)
- Corley v. Lloyd Milliken and "Capt. Jeffery", 608 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1979)