DAVID THOMAS CAREY, APPELLANT,
v.
BOBBY J. LEVERETTE, WARDEN, WEST VIRGINIA STATE PENITENTIARY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an attorney's failure to inform a defendant of their right to appeal after a guilty plea does not, in itself, constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.
David Carey appealed the denial of his habeas corpus petition, arguing his attorney's failure to inform him of his right to appeal after a guilty plea…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
David Carey appeals from a decision of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court properly held that appellant’s constitutional right to effective counsel was not violated when his attorney failed to inform him of his right of appeal following his plea of guilty to a charge of second degree rape in a West Virginia state court. We affirm.
In Nelson v. Peyton, 415 F. 2d 1154 (4th Cir. 1969), this court required that an individual who was convicted following a plea of not guilty be informed of his right to appeal. In the decade since Nelson we have not been faced with the question of whether information on the right to appeal must also be given to an individual who has pled guilty. Other courts have held that failure to notify an individual of his right to appeal following a guilty plea does not in itself constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. See Davis v. Wainwright, 462 F. 2d 1354 (5th Cir. 1972); Williams v. United States, 443 F. 2d 1151 (5th Cir. 1971); Farrington v. North Carolina, 391 F.Supp. 714 (M.D.N.C.1975); Younger v. Cox, 323 F.Supp. 412 (W.D.Va.1971).
Accord Barber v. United States, 427 F. 2d 70 (10th Cir. 1970); Crow v. United States, 397 F. 2d 284 (10th Cir. 1968).
But cf. United States v. Mancusi, 275 F.Supp. 508 (E.D.N.Y.1967).
Agreeing with these decisions, we conclude that there is no constitutional requirement that defendants must always be informed of their right to appeal following a guilty, plea. We recognize that extraordinary circumstances might establish that the omission of advice actually denied a defendant due process of law. See Younger v. Cox, 323 F.Supp. 412, 416 (W.D.Va.1971) (dictum).
Carey, however, has not shown any facts that would justify an exception to the general rule which we announce today.
Although appellant is a state prisoner, we note that the same conclusion would have been reached had he pled guilty to a federal crime. See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(a)(2); Williams v. United States, 443 F. 2d 1151 (5th Cir. 1971); Barber v. United States, 427 F. 2d 70 (10th Cir. 1970).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marrow v. United States, 772 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1985)
-
Laycock v. State OF NEW Mexico, 880 F.2d 1184 (10th Cir. 1989)
-
Belford v. United States, 975 F.2d 310 (7th Cir. 1992)
Authorities Cited
- Nelson v. Peyton, 415 F.2d 1154 (4th Cir. 1969)
- Crow v. United States, 397 F.2d 284 (10th Cir. 1968)
- Williams v. United States, 443 F.2d 1151 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Broward Davis v. Louie L. Wainwright, 462 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir. 1972)
- Barber v. United States, 427 F.2d 70 (10th Cir. 1970)