THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
LAWRENCE LYMAN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the referee's report and orders a public reprimand for attorney misconduct.
The Florida Bar filed a complaint against Lyman for alleged misconduct. Lyman tendered a conditional guilty plea, admitting violations of several Disc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rules cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Lyman’s alleged misconduct. Lyman tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment,* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 2-101(A), 2-102(A) and 5-101. The referee recommended that Lyman be found guilty in accordance with his conditional guilty plea and that he be given a public reprimand with an appearance before the Board of Governors.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter and an appearance before the Board of Governors will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $557.30 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur. *
We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Trapani v. Carmela Gagliardi, 502 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…sclosure is necessary in connection with such an agreement entered into before marriage and that the agreement be in writing were fulfilled. The agreement is enforceable. Contrary to an argument of Carmela, we do not conclude that Evered v. Edsell, 464 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1985), or Stregack v. Moldofsky, 474 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1985), affect the validity of King. Neither of those cases involved the type of fact situation in King and here. Nor do we agree with Carmela’s argument that under In re Estate of Skuro, 487…
-
Grant v. Est. of Theodore D. Grant, 471 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Evered v. Edsell, 464 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1985); Hahn v. Hahn, 465 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Company, 374 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).…