V. M. RADFORD, APPELLEE,
v.
HONORABLE A. A. WEBB, JUDGE OF THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, DISTRICT COURT DIVISION, APPELLANT
V. M. RADFORD, APPELLEE,
HONORABLE A. A. WEBB, JUDGE OF THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, DISTRICT COURT DIVISION, APPELLANT
596 F.2d 1205
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After consideration of the record and the arguments of the parties, both oral and written, we think that the district court correctly granted a writ of habeas corpus. The district court held that §§ 14r-196(a)(l) and (2), N.C.Gen.Stat. (1969), under which petitioner was convicted, violated the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States and were therefore invalid. These statutes proscribe profane, vulgar, lewd and threatening communications over the telephone. As we view the record, particularly the term of his probation, we think that petitioner was convicted only under § 14-196(a)(1); and as to it we affirm on the district court’s memorandum opinion of May 25,1977, and its order of February 20, 1978. See Radford v. Webb, 446 F.Supp. 608 (W.D.N.C.1978).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Velez v. Oxford Dev. Co., 457 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
-
Caldwell v. Ogden SEA Transp., Inc., 618 F.2d 1037 (4th Cir. 1980)
-
Price v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 618 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence