THE CENTRAL PRESS OF MIAMI, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JOE ARUNSKI, APPELLEE
THE CENTRAL PRESS OF MIAMI, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
JOE ARUNSKI, APPELLEE
464 So. 2d 251
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979); B.C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Pedro Realty Inc. v. Silva, 399 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2005)…to drive them into dire financial circumstances with the possibility of swelling the public relief rolls. Lasky v. State Farm Ins. Co., 296 So. 2d 9, 16 (Fla.1974). Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d at 891 (citations omitted); accord Fortune Ins. Co. v. Sims, 464 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Thus, it is clear that one of the purposes of chapter 627 is to make sure that those persons injured in vehicle accidents receive prompt medical attention without having to put themselves into a dire financial position. Section…
-
Hannah v. Newkirk, 675 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1996)…deductible be subtracted from a jury award. She suggests that such a set-off is consistent with the legislative intent of the no-fault scheme, which is to prevent the duplication of benefits for a successful plaintiff. See Fortune Ins. Co. v. Sims, 464 So. 2d 251, 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). She further notes that in electing a deductible an insured party pays a lower insurance premium and becomes a self-insurer as to that deductible. We agree with both the district court and Newkirk that section 627.739(1) pr…
-
Collins v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 540 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…policy containing an $8,000 deductible because it was uncontroverted that plaintiff’s damages did not exceed $8,000. However, as we will explain, plaintiff should be given the opportunity to amend. Plaintiff, citing Fortune Insurance Co. v. Sims, 464 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), argues that no deductible was applicable because the insurance company had failed to ascertain whether plaintiff had disability insurance which would cover the amount of the $8,000 deductible and had failed to advise plaintiff t…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Pedro Realty Inc. v. Silva, 399 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)