IMPERIAL DENTAL PRODUCTS, LTD., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND HOWARD BOCK, PAUL S. BOCK, FLORYNCE BOCK, STANLEY BOCK, AND ALAN BOCK, APPELLANTS,
v.
SABRA DENTAL PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLEE
IMPERIAL DENTAL PRODUCTS, LTD., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND HOWARD BOCK, PAUL S. BOCK, FLORYNCE BOCK, STANLEY BOCK, AND ALAN BOCK, APPELLANTS,
SABRA DENTAL PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLEE
464 So. 2d 197
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages to the plaintiff below on its claims of conspiracy to interfere with a business relationship, restraint of trade, and breach of contract upon a holding that this record is devoid of any evidence which establishes a causal connection between the acts complained of and any resulting damage. See Ethyl Corp. v. Balter, 386 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), pet. for rev. denied, 392 So. 2d 1371 (Fla.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 955, 101 S.Ct. 3099, 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981).
The judgment appealed from is, accordingly, reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Fuksman, 468 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…a.1973), as support for the preponderance standard. While the overwhelming number of Florida decisions, including post-De-nehy cases, contain statements that volun-tariness must be shown by clear and convincing evidence, Bailey; State v. Santamaria, 464 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State v. Spencer, 432 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Leonard v. State, 431 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and while it is unusual for the court to so casually overrule prior case law, we will not, and cannot under Hoffman v. Jon…
-
Tulio Alzate v. State, 466 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…o a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority. Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983). The government’s burden to show voluntary consent is heavier in the ease of an illiterate or a foreigner. State v. Santamaría, 464 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Restrepo v. State, 438 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rosell v. State, 433 So. 2d 1260, 1262 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), pet. for rev. denied, 446 So. 2d 100 (Fla.1984). In my view, the state did not sustain its burden. I am not pe…
-
Damaris Nazario v. State, 535 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…n. . The defendant is Spanish speaking, but one of the deputies is fluent in Spanish, which is his native tongue. After the initial contact, all communications were in Spanish. We do not consider this an issue in this case. See State v. Santamaria, 464 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Restrepo v. State, 438 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). . We note that the trial court additionally commented: The Court’s nevertheless finding that there was not a stop, that the police officers were simply walking down the bus a…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Politis v. Gen. Hotel & Rest. Supply Corp., 386 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Balter v. Ethyl Corp., 452 U.S. 955 (U.S. 1981)