THOMAS HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
THOMAS HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
592 F.2d 281
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1979)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the basis of the District Court’s opinion, 445 F.Supp. 356, holding that Thomas Harrison did not, under Georgia law, have a property interest in his continued employment with the City of College Park Housing Authority. See Bishop v. Wood, 1976, 426 U.S. 341, 96 S.Ct. 2074, 48 L.Ed.2d 684.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
John and Dolores Rank v. Nimmo, 677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
-
Ogletree v. Chester, 682 F.2d 1366 (11th Cir. 1982)
-
Anderson v. U.S. Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev., 701 F.2d 112 (10th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1976)