SYLVESTER ATKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's conviction and sentence on two counts did not violate the double jeopardy clause because he committed two separate offenses.
Sylvester Atkins was convicted of two counts of distributing heroin on different dates. He filed a § 2255 motion alleging his conviction violated the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Double Jeopardy Clause cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Sylvester Atkins was convicted of two counts of distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and was sentenced to serve consecutive prison terms of 12 years on each count and consecutive special parole terms of three years each. His conviction was affirmed by this court, United States v. Atkins, 487 F. 2d 257 (8th Cir. 1973). On May 8, 1975, Atkins filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. After an evidentiary hearing the motion was denied. The order denying a new trial was affirmed by this court, United States v. Atkins, 545 F. 2d 1153 (8th Cir. 1976).
On September 29, 1978, Atkins filed this § 2255 motion alleging that his conviction and sentence on two counts violated the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment, because he committed only a single offense. The district court, 462 F.Supp. 618, rejected his contention on the basis that he committed two separate offenses in making two distributions of heroin, one on August 2,1972, and one on August 16,1972.
We affirm. The transactions underlying the two counts of the indictment were separate and distinct. See United States v. Noel, 490 F. 2d 89, 90 (6th Cir. 1974); United States v. Whitlock, 442 F. 2d 1061, 1063 (8th Cir. 1971). Thus, there was no violation of the double jeopardy clause.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Atkins, 487 F.2d 257 (8th Cir. 1973)
- United States v. Whitlock, 442 F.2d 1061 (8th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Noel, 490 F.2d 89 (6th Cir. 1974)
- United States v. Atkins, 545 F.2d 1153 (8th Cir. 1976)