LAWSON L. LAMAR, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID LINKOVICH, APPELLEE
LAWSON L. LAMAR, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
DAVID LINKOVICH, APPELLEE
463 So. 2d 546
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See In Re: Forfeiture of One 1976 Chevrolet Corvette, VIN 1ZS7L6541240, 442 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1984).
COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH and CO-WART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2002)…ed training and takes into account the “factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.” Schmitt v. State, 563 So. 2d 1095, 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See also McCarter v. State, 463 So. 2d 546, 548-49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (“Probable cause to arrest exists when facts and circumstances within an officer’s knowledge and of which he had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe [*748…
-
Wadada Delhall v. State, 95 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2012)…cient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has [been] or is being committed.” Caraballo v. State, 39 So. 3d 1234, 1246 (Fla.2010) (quoting Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 747-48 (Fla.2002) (quoting McCarter v. State, 463 So. 2d 546, 548-49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985))). The facts and circumstances known to the officers were sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that Delhall was involved in the McCrae shooting. We also conclude that the statements were given…
-
Caraballo v. State, 39 So. 3d 1234 (Fla. 2010)…nd circumstances within an officer’s knowledge and of which he had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that an offense has [been] or is being committed.”) (quoting McCarter v. State, 463 So. 2d 546, 548-49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)). Miranda Claim Caraballo also contends that the taped interview that took place at the FDLE office on the evening of April 28 was conducted in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. We d…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In re Forfeiture OF ONE 1976 Chevrolet Corvette v. Karin Hayes, 442 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)