SOMSAK HOONSILAPA, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
SOMSAK HOONSILAPA, PETITIONER,
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
586 F.2d 755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Opinion [575 F. 2d 735] is modified by adding footnote la to the Opinion at Slip Opinion page 1640 [575 F. 2d at page 738] line 3 of part III, following the words, “home in December, 1974, were illegal,” as follows:
“1a We thus do not decide whether the exclusionary rule is applicable to proceedings before the Immigration & Naturalization Service.”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tejeda-Mata v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 626 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980)
-
Calhoun v. Bailar, 626 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1980)
-
United States v. Orozco-Rico, 589 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Somsak Hoonsilapa v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 575 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1978)