DON V. STINSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1978-12-07
No. 76-2363
585 F.2d 748 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The court en banc, having reheard this habeas cause following our panel opinion reported at 5 Cir., 545 F. 2d 485, has remanded it to us for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Galtieri v. Wainwright, 582 F. 2d 348 (5th Cir. 1978). Our earlier disposition was, but for a contention of petitioner foreclosed by Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976), a remand to the district court for a determination whether state remedies had been exhausted as to his claims.

We conclude that Galtieri has little if any bearing on this case. It deals with petitions containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Here there is doubt whether any of petitioner’s claims have been exhausted. Nevertheless we conclude, exhaustion being a matter of comity and not jurisdiction, that we should reach the merits of petitioner’s remaining claims. The state does not raise exhaustion, and this matter has been in our courts for almost three years — long enough. We have therefore considered these claims, all denied by our district court on their merits. As to each, we conclude that the court was correct.

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw