JOHN D. HUDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
LILLIAN A. HUDSON, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-01-22
No. 84-1497
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
463 So. 2d 380 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Burger v. Burger, 166 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1964).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Manasota-88, Inc. v. Gardinier, Inc., 481 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
    …ny, documentary opinion, or other evidence appropriate to the nature of the issue involved and the agency must expose and elucidate its reasons for its discretionary action. Florida Medical Center v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 463 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), citing E.M. Watkins & Co. v. Board of Regents, 414 So. 2d 583, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Countervailing evidence and argument is permitted. Mcdonald v. Department of Banking and Finance, 346 So. 2d 569, 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).…
  • …opinion, or other evidence appropriate to the nature of the issues involved and the agency must expose and elucidate its reasons for its discretionary action (citations omitted). Florida Medical Center v. Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 463 So. 2d 380, 382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (quoting E.M. Watkins & Co. v. Board of Regents, 414 So. 2d 583, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)). Here, HRS relied upon a policy not recorded in rules or discoverable precedents — the hearing officer’s unauthorized use of his own…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw