JOHN D. HUDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
LILLIAN A. HUDSON, APPELLEE
JOHN D. HUDSON, APPELLANT,
LILLIAN A. HUDSON, APPELLEE
463 So. 2d 380
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Burger v. Burger, 166 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1964).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Gardinier, Inc., 481 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…ny, documentary opinion, or other evidence appropriate to the nature of the issue involved and the agency must expose and elucidate its reasons for its discretionary action. Florida Medical Center v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 463 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), citing E.M. Watkins & Co. v. Board of Regents, 414 So. 2d 583, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Countervailing evidence and argument is permitted. Mcdonald v. Department of Banking and Finance, 346 So. 2d 569, 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).…
-
Upjohn Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs. & Nw. Fla. Home Health Agency, Inc., 496 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…opinion, or other evidence appropriate to the nature of the issues involved and the agency must expose and elucidate its reasons for its discretionary action (citations omitted). Florida Medical Center v. Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 463 So. 2d 380, 382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (quoting E.M. Watkins & Co. v. Board of Regents, 414 So. 2d 583, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)). Here, HRS relied upon a policy not recorded in rules or discoverable precedents — the hearing officer’s unauthorized use of his own…
Authorities Cited
- Lisolette Burger v. Burger, 166 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 1964)