RUDOLPH HUDSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
JAMES A. RHODES ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
RUDOLPH HUDSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
JAMES A. RHODES ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
579 F.2d 46
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Three male inmates of Ohio prisons and two women engaged to marry inmates filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin enforcement of an unwritten policy of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections which forbids the marriage of incarcerated persons. District Judge Don J. Young dismissed the action and plaintiffs appeal.
We affirm on authority of Johnson v. Rockefeller, 365 F.Supp. 377 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d sub nom. (without opinion) Butler v. Wilson, Governor of New York, 415 U.S. 953, 94 S.Ct. 1479, 39 L.Ed.2d 569 (1974); see also Polmaskitch v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 527 (W.D.Okl.1977).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Corr. v. Roseman, 390 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
-
Bradbury v. Louie L. Wainwright, 718 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir. 1983)
-
Bradbury v. Wainwright, 538 F. Supp. 377 (M.D. Fla. 1982)
Authorities Cited
- Vela v. Vowell, 415 U.S. 953 (U.S. 1974)
- Bias v. Gies, 415 U.S. 953 (U.S. 1974)