HARLEY BEVERLY MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court's actions during the defendant's trial did not deny him a fair trial.
The defendant was convicted of knowingly receiving a firearm after a felony conviction. He appealed, arguing the trial court improperly intervened on …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Intervention cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Harley Beverly Morris was convicted of two counts of knowingly receiving a firearm that was shipped in interstate commerce after he was convicted of a felony. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(h)(1), 924(a). On appeal, he argues that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court improperly interjected itself in the government’s behalf during the trial by: (1) instructing the prosecutor to ask certain questions during the government’s cross-examination of Morris, and (2) commenting on the evidence in his instructions to the jury.
We have carefully reviewed the cross-examination of Morris and find that the trial court did not exceed its proper role by becoming another advocate for the government. See United States v. Gregory Date Lowe, No. 77-1680 (8th Cir. February 1, 1978); United States v. McColgin, 535 F. 2d 471, 474-475 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 853, 97 S.Ct. 145, 50 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976); Kramer v. United States, 408 F. 2d 837, 841 (8th Cir. 1969).
While the trial court’s comments on the evidence approached the limits of permissible comment, they did not exceed those limits. See United States v. Brandom, 479 F. 2d 830 (8th Cir. 1973); Scruggs v. United States, 450 F. 2d 359, 363 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1071, 92 S.Ct. 1521, 31 L.Ed.2d 804 (1972); Weare v. United States, 1 F. 2d 617, 618 (8th Cir. 1924).
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Singer, 687 F.2d 1135 (8th Cir. 1982)
Authorities Cited
- Weare v. United States, 1 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1924)
- Scruggs v. United States, 450 F.2d 359 (8th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Junior Wayne McCOLGIN, 535 F.2d 471 (8th Cir. 1976)
- Hawkins v. United States, 429 U.S. 853 (U.S. 1976)
- Meagher v. United States, 429 U.S. 853 (U.S. 1976)
- Kramer v. United States, 408 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1969)
- Lathan v. Deegan, 405 U.S. 1071 (U.S. 1972)
- Archie v. United States, 405 U.S. 1071 (U.S. 1972)
- United States v. Smith F. Brandom, Jr., 479 F.2d 830 (8th Cir. 1973)