SHERIF SHAFEY, APPELLANT,
v.
WAFIYA SHAFEY, APPELLEE
SHERIF SHAFEY, APPELLANT,
WAFIYA SHAFEY, APPELLEE
461 So. 2d 144
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Schuttler v. Schuttler, 429 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Creel v. Creel, 378 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1111 (Fla.1980); Snider v. Snider, 375 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), dismissed, 385 So. 2d 760 (Fla.1980); Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 360 So. 2d 1250 (Fla.1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
WB's Septic & Sitework, Inc. v. Cybil Tucker, 365 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023)…Inc., 580 So. 2d 636, 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (citing Home Elec. of Dade Cnty., Inc. v. Gonas, 547 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1989); Hardrives Co. v. Tri–County Concrete Products, Inc., 489 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Sprinkler Filters v. F.I.T.R. Corp., 461 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)); see also § 713.37, Fla. Stat. (Construction Lien Law, Chapter 713, Part I “shall not be subject to a rule of liberal construction in favor of any person to whom it applies”). That established, precedent applying this required s…
-
Rutenberg-Sarasota, Ltd. v. Eisner, 509 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…ized contract, although not defined by statute, includes a contract directly between the individual claiming to be a laborer and the subcontractor on the project. Sprinkler Fitters and Apprentices Local Union No. 821, U.A. v. F.I.T.R. Service Corp., 461 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), petition for review denied, 472 So. 2d 1182 (Fla.1985). Privity between the owner and the person claiming to be a laborer is, therefore, not a prerequisite to finding that a laborer performed under a properly authorized contract.…
-
Wilfredo Fleitas & Nicolasa Fleitas & Jogar Remodeling Servs., Inc. v. Julson, Inc., 580 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…8] not a human being. The term “person” encompasses individuals and entities, as it is used in the definition section of the Mechanics’ Lien Law. See, e.g., Sprinkler Fitters and Apprentices Local Union No. 821, U.A. v. F.I.T.R. Service Corporation, 461 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), review denied, 472 So. 2d 1182 (Fla.1985). If we adopt the majority’s reasoning that “persons” refers solely to human beings, we would find the Mechanics’ Lien Law in chaos. It would mean that contractors, laborers, materialmen,…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Creel v. Creel, 378 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Dubois v. The Keyes Co., 375 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Snider v. Snider, 375 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Bernadette Schuttler v. Schuttler, 429 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)