UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
FRANK PEDOTE, MICHAEL DEMARO AND AUDREY DEMARO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
FRANK PEDOTE, MICHAEL DEMARO AND AUDREY DEMARO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
557 F.2d 596
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellants’ contention that the failure of the Government to republish schedules of controlled substances under 21 U.S.C. § 812(a) resulted in a failure of proof that heroin is a controlled substance was decided adversely to them in the recent Ninth Circuit decisions of United States v. Eddy, 549 F. 2d 108 (9 Cir. 1976) and United States v. Monroe, 552 F. 2d 860 (9 Cir. 1977). We adopt their reasoning here. The post-trial motion for a new trial or judgment of acquittal was xproperly denied.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.1
. Appellant’s other contentions do not involve any principles of law not heretofore decided by this court and have been disposed of by order without publication.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Chavis v. Rowe, 643 F.2d 1281 (7th Cir. 1981)
-
United States v. Nazario Garcia, 562 F.2d 411 (7th Cir. 1977)
-
McMILLIAN v. W.E. Johnson, 88 F.3d 1554 (11th Cir. 1996)
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Monroe, 552 F.2d 860 (9th Cir. 1977)
- United States v. Eddy, 549 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1976)