JESUS ONATE AGUIRRE, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT

5th Cir. | 1977-06-06
No. 76-3933
Before AINSWORTH, MORGAN and GEE, Circuit Judges.
553 F.2d 501 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the warrantless arrest of the petitioner was legal under the Immigration and Nationality Act, and therefore the evidence obtained was admissible.


Facts & Procedural History

An immigration officer, acting on an anonymous tip, arrested the petitioner who admitted to being an illegal alien and having entered the U.S. illegal…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Jesus Onate Aguirre, seeks review of the decision and order of the Board of Immigration Appeals holding him deportable for having entered the United States from Mexico without having been inspected by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Petitioner contends that the evidence used at the deportation hearing to establish his deportability was inadmissible because he had been illegally arrested and detained. We find no merit to this contention.

The uncontested evidence shows that an Immigration and Naturalization Service of ficer, having received an anonymous telephone call that the Monterey Restaurant was employing illegal aliens, visited the restaurant on May 20, 1976 and stated to petitioner that he was searching for illegal aliens. Petitioner responded that he was the only illegal alien employed there and volunteered information that he had been “picked up before.” Petitioner was arrested and taken to the Immigration and Naturalization Service office in Atlanta, where he signed a statement admitting his alien-age as well as an illegal entry into the United States in January, 1974. This statement and petitioner’s oral statements prior to arrest were received in evidence at the deportation hearing.

Under the express authority of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(1) and (2) the warrantless arrest was legal.1 Petitioner’s voluntary admissions prior to arrest formed a sufficient basis for the arresting officer to believe that petitioner might abscond before a warrant could be obtained, thus justifying the warrantless arrest. The Board of Immigration Appeals, which sustained the order of the Immigration judge, so held. We find no error. ENFORCED.

. The statute provides that:

“(a) Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—

(1) to interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States;

(2) . . to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest . .


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw