MARY ELIZABETH WILSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT W. BICCUM, J. W. MILLER, C. A. GROBE, G. O. PITTMAN, J. J. CURTIS, T. E. DRONE, CHARLES L. HAMMOND AND RETAIL CREDIT COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

5th Cir. | 1977-02-03
No. 75-1033
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and JONES and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.
546 F.2d 676 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1977)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

With undaunted perseverance reflected by at least four decisions in this Court,1 Appellant, on a theory of a conspiracy by defendants to conceal their fraud, seeks to bring this case under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985(3), and 1986. The District Court granted summary judgment which we sustain. There is no adequate state action so § 1983 is unavailable. The § 1985(3) falls before our en banc decision in McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., 5 Cir., 1976, 545 F. 2d 919, rev’g., 526 F. 2d 870. As to the asserted pendent state claim no error has been demonstrated.

AFFIRMED.

. Wilson v. Retail Credit Co., 5 Cir., 1973, 474 F. 2d 1260; Wilson v. Retail Credit Co., 5 Cir., 1972, 457 F. 2d 1406; Wilson v. Retail Credit Co., S.D.Miss., No. 3846, Aff'd., 5 Cir. 1971, 438 F. 2d 1043. Wilson v. Retail Credit Co., S.D. Miss., No. 3846, was originally filed in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, and was removed to the District Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw