WILLIAM R. KISSINGER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES C. FOTI, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and his arguments for tolling were insufficient.
A prisoner filed a Section 1983 action for an alleged beating that occurred in 1974, but did not file suit until 1976. The applicable state statute of…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prescriptive Period cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff prisoner filed an action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 for damages for an alleged beating incident in a Louisiana jail on or about April 18, 1974. Suit was not filed until February 12,1976, greatly in excess of one year from the alleged tort.
In actions such as this, since Section 1983 has no provision limiting the time within which an action may be brought, the applicable statute of limitations is that which the state would apply if suit for similar relief had been brought in state court. O’Sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318, 34 S.Ct. 596, 58 L.Ed. 980 (1914); McGuire v. Baker, 421 F. 2d 895 (5th Cir. 1970); Knowles v. Carson, 419 F. 2d 369 (5th Cir. 1969). The one-year prescriptive period of the Louisiana Civ.Code Art. 3536 governs tort actions for assault and battery in Louisiana. “There is no general rule of law in Louisiana — either legislative or judicial— providing for the interruption or suspension of the prescriptive period because of imprisonment. . . .” Whitsell v. Rodrigues, 351 F.Supp. 1042, 1044 (E.D.La.1972).
Plaintiff’s arguments that he is a “layman-at-law,” a pauper without legal assistance, imprisoned, and has continuously sought administrative relief from various state and federal agencies afford him no defense to the absolute bar of the statute of limitations. The district court properly dismissed plaintiff’s complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Lavellee v. Carlo Listi, 611 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
Harriett Duet Kirk v. Alwynn J. Cronvich, 629 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
Rubin v. O'Koren, 644 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1981)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- O'Sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318 (U.S. 1914)
- McGUIRE v. Baker, 421 F.2d 895 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Walter Frank Knowles alias John Frank Smith v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1969)