UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
WALTER H. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court did not err in denying the motion for a new trial based on a witness's recantation.
Appellant Johnson was convicted of securities fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy. A key government witness, Parker, recanted his trial testimony after …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Governmental Misconduct cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
After a trial by jury appellant Johnson was convicted on all six counts of an indictment charging him with securities fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy. A key government witness at trial was one Parker. Parker pleaded guilty to one count of the indictment; the other charges against him were dismissed. After receiving a sentence more severe than he expected, Parker recanted his trial testimony. He filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea and a hearing was conducted by the district court. As a result of his testimony at this hearing, an indictment charging Parker with eight counts of perjury was returned. Parker initially entered a plea of not guilty to the perjury counts. Pursuant to a plea bargain, however, Parker subsequently entered a plea of guilty to one count of perjury; the other counts were dismissed.
On the basis of Parker’s recantation, appellant Johnson filed a motion for a new trial. The district court denied the motion. In United States v. Johnson, 487 F. 2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825, 95 S.Ct. 41, 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974) this court affirmed Johnson’s conviction, but remanded the case to the district J court for a hearing on two questions: (1) whether Parker presented perjured testimony at trial and (2) whether the government engaged in misconduct by failing to reveal a promise to Parker of a low sentence and, by instigating, encouraging or tolerating incorrect testimony of Parker. After conducting a full evidentiary hearing the district court concluded that Johnson had failed to show either that Parker gave perjured testimony at his (Johnson’s) trial or that the government engaged in misconduct. Parker testified, and the district court found, that his. post trial recantation was a fabrication made in his zeal to free himself and that his trial testimony was truthful. Our review of the record convinces us that the district court’s findings are correct. No error has been demonstrated.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Bruce v. United States, 419 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1974)
- Dellacroce v. United States, 419 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1974)
- United States v. Johnson, 487 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1974)