NAPOLEON ROPER, BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND JAMES E. ROPER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
EFFINGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the School District did not discriminate against the plaintiff in denying him promotions, and the evidence supported the trial court's conclusion.
Plaintiff, a former principal, claimed racial discrimination when denied promotion to principal after his school was integrated. The trial court found…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Desegregation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This dispute grows out of a school case brought in 1969 which resulted in the desegregation of the Effingham County School District. As a result of the Court approved plan, George Hunter, formerly principal of an all black elementary school, became assistant principal of the integrated Effingham County High School. Hunter filed the present action in 1974 claiming racial discrimination in the failure of the School Board to promote him to the office of principal. After an evidentiary hearing the District Judge found that the School District did not discriminate against Hunter in denying him the promotions he sought. We affirm.
Hunter has conceded on appeal that his move from elementary principal to high school assistant principal was not a demotion. Therefore the Singleton1 per se rule requiring that he be offered the next principalship before a non-black was recruited for the job does not apply. The standards set forth in United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 5 Cir., 1967, 380 F. 2d 385, are applicable, however. The School Board has the burden of proving that its personnel decisions were free from racial considerations.
A great deal of evidence was developed below concerning Hunter’s competency and the basis of the School District’s decision to promote others to the principalships. Looking at all of the evidence, the District Court concluded that the School Board’s decision to promote others rather than Hunter was based on merit, or lack thereof, and not on race. Considering particularly the unique position of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support this conclusion. See F.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
Affirmed.
. Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir., 1970, 419 F. 2d 1211, 1218 (en banc). See Pickens v. Okolona Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir., 1976, 527 F. 2d 358.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Birdie Mae Davis v. Bd. OF Sch. Comm'rs OF Mobile Cnty., 600 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1979)
-
LEE v. Wash. Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 625 F.2d 1235 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
Ether L. Barnes v. Jones Cnty. Sch. Dist., 544 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 419 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1969)
- United States & Linda Stout v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 380 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Pickens v. Okolona Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 527 F.2d 358 (5th Cir. 1976)