LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS AS MIDWEST MISSOURI GAS COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court dismissing Count II of appellant’s complaint, is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the trial court consistent with the views expressed in the opinion of this court in Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco Oil Co., 522 F. 2d 33 (8th Cir. 1975). In so doing, this court expresses no opinion as to whether or not damages, as well as injunctive relief, should be awarded by the trial court. That is a matter to be determined after the evidence has been presented.1
_ , , , , Reversed and remanded with directions.
. During oral argument in the earlier case in this court counsel for appellant made the following statement:
I don’t think we would have any claim for damages if the court were to specifically enforce the agreement. I think we would have damages only in the event that it does not do so.
Counsel did not, however, agree to dismiss his second cause of action as originally contended by the appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (47 total)
-
United States v. Sells Eng'g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (U.S. 1983)
-
United States v. Cravero, 545 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1976)
-
United States v. Calvert, 523 F.2d 895 (8th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 47 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Laclede GAS Co. v. Amoco OIL Co., 522 F.2d 33 (8th Cir. 1975)