NAMED INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
NAMED INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
THE TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
519 F.2d 1372
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1975)
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
The decision of the District Court which rejected the claim of plaintiffs for attorneys’ fees in this case is affirmed on the basis of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society et al., 421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cacho v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 547 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1976)
-
Persaud v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 537 F.2d 776 (3d Cir. 1976)
-
Agustin Cobian-Hernandez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 587 F.2d 872 (7th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y, 421 U.S. 240 (U.S. 1975)