FARRAND CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANKLIN B. BYSTROM, DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-10-09
No. 84-727
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
456 So. 2d 973 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Walter v. Schuler, 176 So. 2d 81 (Fla.1965); Bystrom v. Valencia Center, Inc., 432 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Dade County v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 285 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ramsey v. State, 474 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1985)
    …OVERTON, Justice. We accepted jurisdiction in this case because the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s opinion, reported as Ramsey v. State, 456 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), cited as controlling authority State v. Fike, 455 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), which was pending review in this Court. See Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981). We approve the decision of the district court of appeal. S…
  • Mobley v. State, 460 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
    …COWART, Judge, dissenting: I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissent in Fike v. State, 455 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and the dissent in Ramsey v. State, 456 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw