NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
SEQUOIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, ETC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's finding of an unfair labor practice against the Union is supported by substantial evidence and the Board's order should be enforced.
The National Labor Relations Board sought enforcement of its order against the Union for an unfair labor practice. The Union had a history of similar …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Secondary Boycott Provisions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) for enforcement of its order against Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO (“the Union”). The Board’s decision and order are reported at 206 N.L. R.B. No. 8 (1973).
Based on our review of the record as a whole, the Board’s finding that the Union engaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4)), is supported by substantial evidence.
The Board may properly enter a broad order such as this one here if a Union has demonstrated a “proclivity” to violate the secondary boycott provisions of the Act. N. L. R. B. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70, 490 F. 2d 87, 88 (9th Cir. 1973); N. L. R. B. v. Local 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 454 F. 2d 875, 879 (9th Cir. 1972). The record shows that this respondent has a history of similar violations, including one fully litigated decision (186 N. L. R. B. 432 (1970), enforced by this court in an unreported decision filed January 10, 1972), and settlement stipulations in two separate cases (Nos. 20-CC-1143, 1273). The prior settlement stipulations may be treated as equivalent to fully adjudicated decisions of the Board enforced by this court, in accordance with the terms of the stipulations.
The Board’s order will be enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sequoia Dist. Council OF Carpenters, AFL-CIO, 568 F.2d 628 (9th Cir. 1977)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin, 527 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1975)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carpenters Union Local NO. 1622, United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., AFL-CIO, 786 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1986)
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 85, 454 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1972)
- Luckett v. Spivy, 490 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1974)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bhd. OF Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, 490 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1973)