JAMES J. MILLER, PETITIONER,
v.
EARL L. BUTZ, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Judicial Officer did not err in affirming the 21-day suspension of the registrant.
Petitioner Miller sought review of a 21-day suspension as a registrant under the Packers and Stockyards Act, affirmed by the Judicial Officer. The ori…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Packers And Stockyards Act Of 1921 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Miller seeks review of the decision of the Judicial Officer acting for the Secretary of Agriculture entered in a proceeding brought against him under the Packers and Stockyards Act, 7 U.S. C. § 181 et seq. The complaint involved the operations of Miller as the Beaumont Livestock Commission Co., Beaumont, Texas, and DeQuincy Livestock Commission Co., DeQuincy, La., for violations of 7 U.S.C. § 208, 213(a) and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 9 C.F.R. 201.40-42, .59. A trial before an administrative law judge resulted in an opinion adverse to petitioner. He appealed solely on the question of the severity of the sanction, a 21 day suspension as a registrant. The Judicial Officer affirmed the finding of the administrative law judge.
7 U.S.C. § 204 provides that, upon a finding of a violation, the Secretary may issue a suspension of a registrant for a reasonable specified time. The scope of review of this statute was set out in Butz v. Glover, 411 U.S. 182, 188-189, 93 S.Ct. 1455, 1459, 36 L.Ed.2d 142, 148 (1972): “[t]he fashioning of an appropriate and reasonable remedy is for the Secretary, not the court. The court may decide only whether under the pertinent statute and relevant facts, the Secretary made ‘an allowable judgment in [his] choice of the remedy.’ ”
Bowman v. U.S.D.A., 5 Cir., 1966, 363 F. 2d 81, affirmed a 30 day suspension for the same violations involving multiple stockyards. It also considered the adverse publicity issue raised by petitioner and found it lacking.
Petitioner’s allegation of the lack of an opportunity for an impartial and unbiased appeal before the Judicial Officer is not supported by the record.
The petition for review is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cross v. United States, 512 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1975)
-
Noell v. Bensinger, 586 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
J. Acevedo AND Sons v. United States & Earl L. Butz, 524 F.2d 977 (5th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm'n Co., Inc., 411 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1973)
- Bowman v. United States Dep't OF Agric. & Orville Freeman, 363 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1966)