LORENE W. BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
FIELDCREST MILLS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A private remedy under the Occupational Safety and Health Act is precluded when the employee's death is covered by state workmen's compensation law.
Plaintiff sued for wrongful death, alleging the defendant's violation of OSHA caused her intestate's death. The intestate died from injuries sustained…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM:
Alleging that the defendants’ negligent violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq., was the proximate cause of her intestate’s death, the plaintiff instituted this action for damages in the district court. Since, concededly, plaintiff’s intestate died as the result of injuries sustained in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant, Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., which was covered under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, the district court concluded that 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4)1 precluded a private remedy and dismissed the action under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments we agree with this conclusion of the district court and affirm the judgment of dismissal.2
Affirmed.
. “Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to supersede or in any manner affect any workmen’s compensation law or to enlarge or diminish or affect in any other manner the common law or statutory rights, duties, or liabilities of employers and employees under any law with respect to injuries, diseases, or death of employees arising out of, or in the course of, employment.” 29 U.S.C. § 653 (b)(4).
. Cf. Skidmore v. Travelers Insurance Company, 356 F.Supp. 670 (E.D.La.1973), aff’d per curiam, 483 F. 2d 67 (5 Cir. 1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Earnest Goodman v. Kendall Gate-Investco., Inc., 395 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
-
United Steelworkers OF Am. v. Marshall, 647 F.2d 1189 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
-
Kelso and Mary Rankin v. City OF Wichita Falls, 762 F.2d 444 (5th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Skidmore v. Travelers Ins. Co., 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Savage v. United States, 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973)