NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
LUNDAY-THAGARD OIL COMPANY, RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
LUNDAY-THAGARD OIL COMPANY, RESPONDENT
496 F.2d 1195
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The record does not support the respondent’s contention that it was deprived of significant procedural rights. See the Board’s Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.69 (c.) (1973); see also NLRB v. Singleton Packing Corp., 418 F. 2d 275, 280 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824, 91 S.Ct. 47, 27 L.Ed. 2d 53 (1970); Sonoco Products Co. v. NLRB, 399 F. 2d 835, 839 (9th Cir. 1968); NLRB v. J. R. Simplot Co., 322 F. 2d 170, 172 (9th Cir. 1963). Upon the basis of the record and the Petitioner’s Decision and Order, reported at 203 NLRB No. 12, the challenged Order will be
Enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Camil, 497 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1974)
-
United States v. Mars, 551 F.2d 711 (6th Cir. 1977)
-
United States v. Mathews, 997 F.2d 848 (11th Cir. 1993)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. Int'l Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, 400 U.S. 824 (U.S. 1970)
- Kennedy Book Store, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 400 U.S. 824 (U.S. 1970)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Singleton Packing Corp., 418 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. R. Simplot Co., 322 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1963)
- Sonoco Prods. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 399 F.2d 835 (9th Cir. 1968)