STEPHEN SACHER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
COLUMBIA STEAMSHIP COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AMERICAN STEAMSHIP OWNERS MUTUAL PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY SOCIETY IN NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1974-05-08
No. 74-1222
493 F.2d 1109 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1974)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff-appellant was injured aboard the S.S. COLUMBIA BANKER, in the Pacific Ocean. The Vessel was owned by the Columbia Steamship Company, which, in turn, was insured by American Steamship Owner’s Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. The policy of insurance was both written and delivered in the State of New York. The plaintiff attempted to bring suit against both his employer, the steamship company, and, through the Louisiana Direct Action statute (LSA-P.S. 22:655), the insuror of his employer. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company on the ground that the Louisiana Direct Action statute cannot be applied against an insurance company with reference to an accident which did not take place in the State of Louisiana and where the policy was neither written nor delivered in that State.

Under the authority of Kirchman v. Mikula, 5 Cir., 1971, 443 F. 2d 816 (citing Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company, 251 La. 558, 205 So. 2d 398 (1967), the judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw