ROBERT R. WASKIN, APPELLANT,
v.
GLORIA WASKIN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-08-07
No. 84-1349
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
453 So. 2d 892 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla.1976); Waskin v. Waskin, 452 So. 2d 999 (Fla.3d DCA, 1984).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Butts v. State, 733 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …out this case. The trial court did not err by admitting testimony of appellant’s prior bad acts concerning the victim. The testimony was relevant and admissible to rebut the defense theme that the victim’s death was accidental. See Ledlow v. State, 453 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Moreover, appellant failed to renew his objection to the similar fact testimony at trial. See Correll v. State, 523 So. 2d 562, 566 (Fla.1988) (“Even when a prior motion in limine has been denied, the failure to object at the ti…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw