MAUREEN S. LAROUERE, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES U. LAROUERE, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1984-08-01
No. 83-1751
DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
453 So. 2d 516 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1984) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Chief Judge.

RYDER, Chief Judge.

From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla.1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shockley v. State, 465 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Waters, 436 So. 2d 66 (Fla.1983); Hendrix v. State, 455 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Williams v. State, 453 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw