CAPTAIN C. J. TAYLOR ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
THE CITY OF JACKSON ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, L. J. SULLIVAN ET AL., INTERVENORS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint did not allege facts rising to constitutional levels for federal jurisdiction.
A police officer sued the city civil service commission under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging mistreatment due to new promotion practices after an organiza…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Captain C. J. Taylor, a Jackson, Mississippi, police officer, seeks to invoke federal jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), complaining of mistreatment at the hands of the municipal civil service commission of the City of Jackson. The District Court overruled the defendant city’s motion to dismiss. We granted leave to take an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We reverse.
Miss.Code 1972 Ann. § 21-31-1 et seq. authorized creation of the Jackson municipal civil service commission. Section 21-31-13 provides that “[a] 11 appointments to and promotions in [fire and police departments covered by municipal commissions] shall be made solely on merit, efficiency, and fitness, which may be ascertained by open competitive examination and impartial investigation.” Taylor’s complaint alleges that following an organizational shakeup in the Jackson police department, he and many of his fellow officers were victimized by new promotion practices. It alleges in general terms deprivation of rights secured by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. None of the specific charges, however, points to even a color-able interference with First Amendment rights to free speech, press, association, and religious observance, or to interference with Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection.1 Fairly read the complaint as amended says no more than that the effects of the challenged new departmental practices fell randomly upon various individuals on the force. This is not enough to rise to constitutional levels. See McDowell v. Texas, 465 F. 2d 1342 (5th Cir. 1971) (en banc); Dorsey v. NAACP, 408 F. 2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1969). The matters which Taylor alleges in his complaint are matters of state statutes to be raised, if he desires, in the courts of the state.
Reversed.
. The complaint originally contained allegations of racial discrimination, but plaintiffs amended to withdraw the racial claims from consideration.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Corley v. Jackson Police Dep't, 566 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
Charline Hamilton v. Jess Chaffin, 506 F.2d 904 (5th Cir. 1975)
-
Corley v. Jackson Police Dep't, 639 F.2d 1296 (5th Cir. 1981)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- McDOWELL v. The State OF Tex., 465 F.2d 1342 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Dorsey v. Nat'l Ass'n FOR the Advancement OF Colored People, 408 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1969)