GEORGE W. EAGER, SR., APPELLANT,

v.

NORMA S. EAGER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pioneer Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Reeder, 453 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …by Congress, effective October 15, 1982. These arguments were raised in a recent case before this court involving parties that were in essentially the same posture as those in the instant ease. Kiefer v. Fortune Federal Savings & Loan Association, 453 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Pursuant to the rationale of that decision, we hold that prior to June 8, 1976, the effective date of 12 C.F.R. § 545.8-3(f) (1982), federal law did not preempt applicable state law concerning the enforcement of due on sale claus…
• First Fed. Sayings & Loan Ass'n of Winter Haven v. Glenn N. Siegel and wife, 456 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …an association or Federal savings bank. Although the mortgage in the case at bar was made and assumed during the “window period,” and although Florida is undoubtedly a “window period” state, see Kiefer v. Fortune Federal Savings & Loan Association, 453 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), quoting with , approval from Weiman v. McHaffie, 448 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), First Federal disputes the Siegels and Rickards’ position, accepted by the court below, that the “window period” provision of section 17Olj — 3…
• Haven Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Rodger W. Carl, 456 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …, 1981, and February 24, 1982, made in violation of the due on sale clause. This court’s decisions in Pioneer Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Reeder, 453 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), and Kiefer v. Fortune Federal Savings & Loan Association, 453 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), recently rejected Haven Federal’s argument that a 1948 regulation of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board authorizing federal savings and loan associations to “provide for full protection to the federal association” had the effect of…

Authorities Cited

• Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1980)