NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
BEDFORD DISCOUNTERS, INC., RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
The findings of the Board that the Bedford Discounters, Inc. violated the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 151 et. seq. §§ 8(a)(1) by engaging in threats of reprisal, coercive interrogation, promises and grants of benefits and 8(a)(3) and (1) in discharging employees because of their union activity are amply supported by the record as a whole. Further, because the Board’s findings are clearly supported, we cannot regard the company’s resistance thereto as anything but frivolous: “Some penalty should attach to taking up our time with such a meritless contention.” N.L.R.B. v. Smith & Wesson, 424 F. 2d 1072, 1073 (1st Cir. 1970).
Application for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board is granted and pursuant to FRAP 38 the Board will recover, in addition to its regular costs, the sum of $250 for expenses.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 731 F.2d 64 (1st Cir. 1984)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catalina Yachts, 679 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1982)
-
First Nat'l Ins. Co. OF Am. v. Lynn, 525 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Smith & Wesson, 424 F.2d 1072 (1st Cir. 1970)