BOCA BANANA BOAT AND CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY C/O BRUNS CASUALTY GENERAL AGENCY, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
SHERRY CARTER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was competent substantial evidence that the claimant's back pain caused her fall, making the injury compensable.
A waitress slipped and fell, injuring her back, shoulder, and neck. Later, while on the job, she experienced sharp back pain, fell again, and had a se…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Idiopathic Fall cases and more on FLexlaw
MILLS, Judge.
The • employer/carrier appeal from a workers’ compensation order contending the deputy’s finding that Carter sustained a compensable injury is not supported by competent substantial evidence. We do not agree and affirm.
Carter was a waitress at the Boca Banana Boat, a restaurant in Fort Lauder-dale. On 18 July 1983, while going into the kitchen, she slipped on some water, fell, and injured her shoulder, neck, and back. She was treated for her injuries by Dr. Bruns, who diagnosed a possible lumbar herniation. Carter began wearing a back support and returned to work.
On 15 August 1983, Carter was on the job carrying a tray of glasses. She testified that she felt a sharp pain in her back. She again fell, struck her head, went into a seizure, and sustained serious damage to her teeth. Doris Dixon, who witnessed the fall, testified that she saw Carter grab her back and then fall. Dr. Perry testified that he did not know whether Carter slipped and fell or whether she had a seizure and fell.
The employer/carrier argue that Carter’s testimony does not reveal what caused her to fall, that Doris Dixon’s testimony is consistent with Carter having had a seizure before falling, and that the medical testimony about the cause of Carter’s fall is also unclear. Apparently, the employer/carrier contend that Carter’s injuries resulted from an idiopathic fall, and, therefore, are not compensable. Not so. Clearly, there is compe tent substantial evidence that Carter’s back pain caused her to fall.
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.