HIDDEN WEALTH, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ROYAL PETROLEUM, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, STEVEN H. KAPLAN, AND OTHERS, APPELLEES
HIDDEN WEALTH, INC., APPELLANT,
ROYAL PETROLEUM, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, STEVEN H. KAPLAN, AND OTHERS, APPELLEES
453 So. 2d 106
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We sua sponte dismiss the appeal upon the ground of lack of standing by appellant here and in the trial court. See Vogel v. Smith, 371 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Popescu v. Laguna master Ass (9th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2017)…e allowed to intervene. Consequently, neither Ge nor S&A are parties to the action below and have no standing either here or in the court below. Therefore, the Court dismisses this appeal sua sponte. See Hidden Wealth, Inc. v. Royal Petroleum, Inc., 453 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (citing Vogel v. Smith, 371 So. 2d 719 (3rd DCA 1979)).6 Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the present appeal is hereby DISMISSED because Appellant and Cross-appellant do not have standing before the Court.…
Authorities Cited
- Vogel v. Smith, 371 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Mollie Knapp v. The State of Fla. Dep't OF Rehabilitative Serv., 371 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)