IRBY SPROUSE, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES C. MOORE, CASEWORKER, U. S. PENITENTIARY, AND J. D. HENDERSON, WARDEN, ETC., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
IRBY SPROUSE, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
CHARLES C. MOORE, CASEWORKER, U. S. PENITENTIARY, AND J. D. HENDERSON, WARDEN, ETC., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
476 F.2d 995
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, an inmate of the federal penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia, appeals from the denial by the United States District Court of his petition for mandamus to force the prison authorities to allow him the use of typewriters for legal correspondence and matters other than formal motions to the courts. We affirm.
As we just recently said in Stubblefield v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1973, 475 F. 2d 26: 433 F. 2d 958; Durham v. Blackwell, 5th Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 838; see also Tarlton v. Henderson, 5th Cir. 1972, 467 F. 2d 200. It follows, therefore, that an inmate has no federally protected right to use typewriters for correspondence, whether personal or legal.” “It is well established that an inmate has no federally protected right to the use of typewriters to prepare legal writs. Williams v. United States Department of Justice, 5th Cir., 1970, Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eisenhardt v. Britton, 478 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Tarlton v. Henderson, 467 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1972)
- Durham v. Olin G. Blackwell, 409 F.2d 838 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Haywood Williams, Jr. v. U. S. Dep't OF Just., 433 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Kermit Stubblefield v. Henderson, 475 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1973)