AKIN MOBILE HOMES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The district court correctly dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, as the Tucker Act vests exclusive jurisdiction for claims exceeding $10,000 in the Court of Claims.
Plaintiff leased mobile homes to HUD for hurricane victims. Plaintiff sought to renegotiate the contract due to unanticipated state and local taxes, a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Court Of Claims cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The appellant’s suit was dismissed below without prejudice to the plaintiff’s right to sue the United States under the Tucker Act1 in the U. S. Court of Claims.2
The suit arose out of a dispute concerning contractual negotiations between the parties for the lease on an emergency basis of approximately 400 mobile homes to HUD for the use of residents of Southern Mississippi rendered homeless by Hurricane Camille, which struck the Mississippi Gulf Coast on August 17, 1969. According to the complaint the plaintiff was required to pay state and local taxes in the amount of $76,002.25, an item not contemplated in the telegraphic negotiations between the parties. The complaint alleged that HUD had renegotiated other contracts to take care of similar inequities with other lessors similarly situated, and that officials of HUD had failed and refused to renegotiate appellant’s contract.
The district judge was not in error in concluding that this case should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and further that Title 12, U.S.C., Section 1702, does not provide a basis for concurrent jurisdiction of the district court with the Court of Claims. The judgment appealed from is Affirmed.
. The amount claimed exceeded the district court’s $10,000 limitation pi jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1346(a)(2).
. The memorandum-opinion and judgment of the lower court are reported sub nom. Akin Mobile Homes, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Housing & Urban Development, An Agency of the U. S. Government, Washington, D.C., S.D.Miss.1972, 354 F.Supp. 1036.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marcus Garvey Square, Inc. v. Winston Burnett Constr. Co. OF Cal., Inc., 595 F.2d 1126 (9th Cir. 1979)
-
United States & United States ex rel. Sec'y v. Hon. Milbern J. Adams, 634 F.2d 1261 (10th Cir. 1980)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)